In my previous discussion on the Riemann Sphere I talked of it as a closed sphere of infinite extent, but it can also be represented as a sphere of finite extent.
In this case imagine a sphere centred on the origin and of unit radius. Then any complex number can be represented as a point on the sphere’s surface by simply drawing a line from the pole to that point on the (complex) plane – where the line intersects the sphere is the point that represents the number (numbers of magnitude of less than one are represented by the underside of the sphere).
This is, in one sense, a consequence of the infinity of the continuum – we are projecting an infinite line on to a finite line, but as the points on both lines have the same cardinality there can be a one to one correspondence – it’s another thing of beauty, I think.
I will explain the maths of the sphere in a moment, but I am left wondering if one of two things apply:
(a) We are terrible at teaching maths in this country because although it produces such beautiful concepts too many children – perhaps a majority – think it is a thing of drudgery; or
(b) The appeal of maths is inherently limited and the number of people fascinated by a concept as seemingly contradictory as a closed surface of infinite extent is always going to be limited.
Anyway, here’s an explanation of the sphere…
We want to think about infinity but we will, at first, restrict our thinking to a single, straight line. We can say how far along this line we are by measuring the distance from an arbitrary starting point. So, we could be 1 unit along, units along or units along and so on.
In fact we can represent where we are on the line by a ratio and represent each point in the form . So can be for instance, so we are not restricted to the rationals in this form.
Now , think of this as one way to get further and further from our arbitrary starting point – first we go 1 unit and so are at then we go to then and so on – and we approach the limit which is the furthest we can possibly be and which we call infinitely far away from our starting point.
But what if we went in the other (negative) direction? Then we’d go to , and so on … but at the limit we’d go to – exactly the same place we’d go to if we started in the opposite direction: hence the “negative” and “positive” infinities are the same and this line is actually a loop.
Then we have to plot numbers on a plane, not a line and so every number has two co-ordinates, one of the form we discussed above in the form of the reals – eg and one along the imaginary axis of the form – we thus we get an infinite set of infinite closed loops – a sphere.