My friend and former colleague Adam Higgitt every Friday posts a list of “five things I have learned this week”. It’s popular and good fun – especially as Adam is not afraid of an argument if you challenge some of his claims.

For a while I tried to do the same thing myself, but failed miserably.

I am not going to try again, but I am proposing to try something different, if inspired by Adam.

So here is the first list of things “learnt this week” scientific or mathematical facts and amusements. I will aim for five, but this week just did not make it.

**1. A random walk can be used to build a binomial distribution – but not a very good one!**

Imagine a left-right ruled line centred on zero and a marker than can, in every time step move either left or right be one step where the probability of moving left and of moving right, are both the same: i.e., . At the “beginning of time” the marker stands at 0.

Then if we count the times the marker is at any given position they will be distributed bionomially (well, as we approach an infinite time). The BASIC code below (which I wrote using BINSIC) should give you an idea (this code runs the risk of an overflow though, of course and the most interesting thing about it is how unlike a binomial distribution the results can be).

10 DIM A(1001) 12 FOR I = 1 TO 1001 14 LET A(I) = 0 16 NEXT I 20 LET POS = 500 30 FOR I = 1 TO 50000 40 LET X = RND * 2 50 IF X > 1 THEN LET POS = POS + 1 ELSE LET POS = POS - 1 60 LET A(POS) = A(POS) + 1 70 NEXT I 80 PRINT "*****BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION*****" 90 FOR I = 1 TO 1001 95 LET X = I - 500 110 PRINT X," ",A(I) 120 NEXT I

Here’s a chart of the values generated by similar code (actually run for about 70,000 times):

**2. Things that are isomorphic have a one-to-one relationship**

Up to this point I just had an informal “things that look different but are related through a reversible transformation” idea in my head. But that’s not fully correct.

A simple example might be the logarithms. Every real number has a unique logarithm.

## 2 responses to “Learnt this week… 24 January”

Hi, surely a reversible transformation contains the idea of 1-1?

You might have a point there, I suppose reversible is the key bit. I was thinking how a circle can be transformed into any number of ellipses but on seeing a circle you cannot determine what ellipse may have generated it – as a circle is a circle, but I guess that is to miss the point. (This all came from reading about transforming hyperbolae into circles).